I am planning to make this change within the next two major releases, so hopefully this will help improving usability around "archive_modified" option. Restoring from this becomes as trivial as copying stuff back, just like it is for the primary backup copies. So what I think needs to be done is to just create date/time tagged top-level folder in $Archive for every run that archives something and then store the files/folders there, as is. That's what the archiving was originally for, and this is why it uses this funky scheme of appending timestamps to the names. In particular, the main scenario was simpler users directing their backups at already populated folder, clicking through all the warnings and then wondering where the heck all their stuff went. It was originally done this way because archiving was meant to be a pure safety net feature to help people recovering from accidental deletes at source. That, I think, has a simpler solution, which is to change the $Archive to NOT add timestamps to the archived file names. The only case where restoring support is justified is when restoring from the _archive_. It is nice to have the VHDX file in a RW mode when using FSlogix. It handles the block level and even opens files. I still think that restore functionality doesn't belong to the program, because it will still front rather trivial functionality and I am against adding features of this kind, especially if they will have a prominent UI presence, which will imply that they *are* more complicated that they actually are. Bvckup2 settings (Great break down) FSLogix Container Replication with Bvckup2 () Bvckup2 could achieve this for me, and it is something I highly recommend for FSLogix HA solutions. Jul 22, - I merged all your posts into one and moved it here from "Feature requests" thread. What's a good backup tool without a convenient way to restore the backups it produces? :) but then again, maybe a separate backup restore tool, like in the screenshots above, would prove very useful, otherwise, and that's even more true when using file versioning) restoring a previous state is a total pain. I've read your position about Bvckup being a backup-only tool and not wanting to make it too complex by adding other features. Sry, if the above image link is not working, try In the future, could a similar version be implemented? Thanks! When I browse a back-upped dir, I can see the files, the several version of the files available, and I can restore a dir at a specified point in time. Bvckup addresses this by displaying all backup activity in a hierarchical manner making it really easy to drill down from the high-level information to really specific details.Bvckup2 works wonders, but I feel there's no convienent way of restoring from Bvckup2 backups. Being able to understand what was happening during the backup comes in handy in many situations, but it is easy to get buried under all the details. One of the other key features for Bvckup is its logging system. This means that if only 2 MB changes in a 5 GB file, only 2 MB of data is copied over, and the time savings can be immense. This is how Bvckup works it uses an algorithm to check each part of the original file against the respective part of its existing backup copy and copies across only parts that have changed. But what if you could copy not just the modified files, but only modified parts of the files? It only makes sense to be selective with what to copy. Backing up is inherently a process of copying files from one location to another, and the way the copying is carried out dictates the overall speed of the backup.īackups that copy every file on every run clearly do a lot of redundant work if the files haven’t changed and for large backups this can be very time consuming.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |